So the Republican Party is in the midst of the process of nominating a candidate to run against President Obama. It was evident what kind of leader Mr. Obama was going to be early in his presidency. There would be great opportunity to show the difference between a fiscal conservative that adheres to the constitution and Mr. Obama. There was adequate time to find someone who could articulate a position that would easily defeat Mr. Obama. But instead we now watch the three stooges put on their silly show at these so called debates. While I appreciate the position being taken by Ron Paul concerning fiscal conservatism, the fact of the matter is that at age 76, I don't have confidence in his ability to serve out a four year term. The office of the president is very demanding and stressful. It takes a man in his 40's and 50's and makes him look 20 years older when he leaves office.
So I ask, is that the best there is to offer? Or were those that could have been elected told to "sit down and shut up".
Sorry, I don't see any of these four that are currently in the limelight as having any chance of defeating Mr. Obama.
(And, no, I don't want to see Mr. Obama serve another term)
No comments:
Post a Comment